|
> MSU Policy and Procedures > Faculty Handbook
t =
0 April, Year 1 Faculty
member receives 1st
"unsatisfactory" performance
evaluation. Faculty member appeals. Dean responds to appeal.
t = 1 month May, Year
1 Primary Administrative Reviewer
and faculty member work out 1st
remediation plan
t = 11 months March 15th, Yr
2 Faculty member receives 2nd
"unsatisfactory" performance
evaluation. Faculty
member appeals.
t = 1 year April 5th,
Yr 2 Dean responds to appeal. Primary
Review Committee begins
evaluating faculty member's
annual review materials
t = 1 year, 1 month May 1st, Year
2 Faculty member receives Primary
Review Committee's decision
t = 1 year, 1 month May 15th,
Year 2 Faculty member's response due to
next higher level of administrative
review
t = 1 year, 2 months June, Year
2 Recommendation from next higher
level of
review due to Provost
t = 1 year, 3 months July, Year
2 Recommendation from Provost due
to President
t = 1 year, 4 months August 15th, Year
2 President's letter informing of
formation of
University-level Post-
Tenure Review Committee due to
faculty member
t = 1 year, 7 months Nov. 15nd,
Year 2 Faculty member's dossier due
t = 1 year, 8 months Dec. 15th,
Year 2 University-level Post-Tenure Review
Committee's decision due
t = 1 year, 9 months Jan. 1, Year 2
Initiation of Termination for Cause
Proceedings against faculty member
|
